JOHN MARK: Always Playing Second Fiddle
There is a little ditty that describes John Mark perfectly. It goes like this:
'It takes more grace than I can tell
To play the second fiddle well."
statement attributed to the late Leonard Bernstein, the famous conductor of the
New York Philharmonic, states: 'The hardest instrument in the orchestra to play
is second fiddle."
fellow named Bo Bradham attended a fiddle camp in September of 1996 and wrote about
that experience. The story is
recounted of a fiddler from Texas named Randy Elmore who was at a 'jam session'
the first night of camp. Bo states
that "Randy" sat there quietly, and every time Mark [O'Conner, an accomplish
fiddler in his own right] played a tune, Randy was right there with the second
fiddle part. 'Playing second
fiddle' has become synonymous with being out of the limelight, not the lead
dog--but you know and I know just how hard it is to do, and how uncommon it
is for someone to be really good at it.
Moreover, it speaks volumes about someone to volunteer for that
difficult but unglamorous part." I was intrigued by Bo's statement so I
contacted Randy Elmore in order to get an understanding of what it means to play
I was fascinated to learn that the fiddle and the violin
are the exact same instrument. The
only difference between them, however, is the musician and the music being
played on the instrument. For
example, the instrument is called a violin when the musician plays classical
music in an orchestra at Carnegie Hall.
The same instrument is called a fiddle when the musician plays Bluegrass
music or other 'non-classical- music for events such as a square dance, or a
ho-down, at the State Fair.
The person playing first fiddle plays the melody. This is the tune that people know and the audience listens for at a concert. Mr. Elmore chuckled when he said that, in reality, the first fiddle is the boring part because the fiddler only plays the melody and should not deviate from it. The second fiddle, on the other hand, plays the harmony. Mr. Elmore thought this was the fun part because the fiddler could be creative with the harmony and do fancy finger work. This is the harder part because the fiddler must know how to harmonize the music as well as play higher notes as he moves his fingers up the throat of the fiddle. It takes much practice to play this part well. The purpose of the second fiddle is to play a supporting role and compliment the first fiddle, thus making the first fiddle look and sound good. The audience does not realize that the second fiddler is playing his heart out in order to make the first fiddler look good; yet the second fiddler does not get any credit for what is played. Thus, this part is unglamorous.
John Mark seems to have been always played second
fiddle (ah, Gospel bluegrass, of course! J). He played second fiddle
for Peter, as a son in the faith and a disciple. He played second fiddle to Paul, as a helpful servant and
later, a trusted confidant. He
played second fiddle to Barnabas, his cousin and co-worker. He was good at this difficult but
I will meaningfully try to reconstruct the life of John Mark. He keeps popping up here and there in Scripture, so we will have to use some conjecture as well as rely upon two early church Fathers, Eusebius and Jerome, and the apocryphal book of The Acts of Barnabas which allegedly was written by John Mark. The apocryphal books should be used with caution, but could prove helpful.
first introduced to John Mark is in Acts 12. These events take place during the Feast of Unleavened Bread
in Jerusalem (12:3) in the year AD 44.
At that time Peter miraculously was released from prison and he went to
the house of Miriam / Mary (12:12).
Because there are a number of Miriams in the early Church, Luke has to
distinguish which one he is referring to, so he identifies her as the mother of
John Mark. Whether
John is there or not, we are not told.
He could be in Jerusalem because it is the Passover, a festival where all
Jewish males were required to go on pilgrimage to the Holy City (Deuteronomy
16:1-12). Luke also tells us that many
were gathered in Miriam's house to pray for Peter (Acts 12:12).
In the English Bible his name is given as 'John." This was his Hebrew name and it would be translated 'Yohanan' which means 'grace'. His Latin name was 'Marcus." This may indicate that he was a Roman citizen. Paul wrote his latter epistles in the AD 60's and calls him Mark (Col. 4:10; II Tim. 4:11; Philemon 24). Dr. Luke, also writing in the AD 60's uses both names together three times (12:12, 25; 15:37), his Hebrew name alone, twice (13:5, 13), and his Latin name alone, only once (15:39).
Edersheim, in his monumental book, The Life and Times of Jesus the Messiah, suggests that Jesus and His disciples had their
last Passover meal together at the home of Miriam and her husband (1976: 484,
485). This is conjecture, but it
is a very strong possibility. Mark
later would record the instructions that Jesus gave Peter, 'Go into the city,
and a man will meet you carrying a pitcher of water; follow him. Wherever he goes in, say to the master
of the house, 'The Teacher says, "where is the guest room in which I may eat
the Passover with My disciples?'" (Mark 14:14).
The master of the house would be John Mark's father. In Acts 12, it is called the house of Miriam. One could surmise that John Mark's father had passed away sometime between AD 30 and AD 44, either by natural causes or part of the persecution of the church (Acts 8:1; 9:1, 3; 26:10; Gal. 1:13).
the conjecture of Jesus and His disciples meeting in the home of John Mark's
family is correct, what can we learn about John Mark's upbringing? The description of the house that John
Mark lived in that is recorded in the Gospels and the book of Acts indicates
that it was a well-to-do house in the Upper City of Jerusalem.
In the excavations in the Jewish Quarter of the Old
City of Jerusalem that were conducted after the Six Days War in 1967 several
Herodian mansions were excavated by Prof. Nahman Avigad. These mansions were very impressive
structures that attested to the wealth and high standard of living in Jerusalem
up until the destruction of the city in AD 70 (Avigad 1980: 81-202).
We are told that the house had an upper room (Mark
14:25 // Luke 22:12) At least one room was large enough to hold many people
for a prayer meeting (Acts 12:12, 13).
At one time the house had a male servant (Mark 14:13) as well as a
female servant, Rhoda (Acts 12:14).
John Mark, most likely, was raised in a well to do, financially secure
Mark also was surrounded with Christian influence in his teen years. He might have met Jesus as He came in
for His last Passover with His disciples.
After the Ascension of the Lord Jesus the disciples returned to the
upper room for a prayer meeting (Acts 1:12-14). The house seems to be one of the places where the early
church gathered in Jerusalem. When
Peter miraculously was released from prison in Acts 12, he went to the prayer
gathering at Miriam's house. Rhoda
recognized his voice. This seems
to indicate that she knew him personally and that Peter was a frequent visitor
to the house.
Mark, when he composed the gospel that bears his name, records the events that
took place in Gethsemane. One
event indicates that he was an eye-witness to what transpired on that Passover
night and another event only he would have known about and recorded.
After the Passover meal, Jesus and His disciples left
the Upper Room and went to the Temple and then on to Gethsemane on the eastern
slopes of the Kidron Valley. Judas
led the Temple guards to the place where Jesus was, and they arrested Him. Mark writes that one of those who
stood by drew his sword and struck the servant of the high priest, and cut off
his ear (Mark 14:47). Mark does
not identify who wielded the sword and cut off the ear because when he wrote
the gospel, Peter was still very much alive and visiting Jerusalem.
Anything Mark wrote could and would be used against
Peter in a court of law, and Mark did not want to rat on his friend and mentor. It is only after the death of Peter
that the Apostle John, another eye-witness to the event, identifies Peter as
the one who cut of the deputy high priest's ear (18:10, 11).
In this passage, Mark does not use the generic word for ear, but a specific term for the earlobe. This indicates that John Mark was an eye-witness to this event and tells us specifically what happened in the garden. Benjamin Viviano discusses the significance of the cutting-off of the earlobe in this account (1989: 71-80).
After Jesus was arrested and His disciples fled (Mark 14:43-50), Mark records, 'Now a certain young man followed Him, having a linen cloth thrown around his naked body. And the young men laid hold of him, and he left the linen cloth and fled from them naked (Mark 14:51, 52). Mark had not heard about this incident from Peter because he already had fled the scene. Only John Mark knew who the first, and only, Streaker was in the Bible; it was himself!
Mark apparently went to bed after the family Passover meal, but when he heard
Jesus and His disciples departing, his curiosity was raised. He threw a linen cloth around his body
and followed at a distance. Later,
he recounts his story.
how old John Mark was at this Passover in AD 30, we are not told. All Mark records is a certain young
man," probably anywhere between 16 and 19 years old. I will assume he was 18 years old for the calculations of
the chronology of his life.
the early church historian, quotes Papias,
an Apostolic Father writing about AD 140, as saying John Mark had not heard
the Lord, nor had he followed Him (Ecclesiastical History 3:39:15; LCL 1: 297). He was too young to have traveled with Jesus and to hear His
parables, sermons and discourses. Yet he was a curious onlooker in Gethsemane.
a teenager, John Mark had godly Jewish parents who were interested and involved
in the ministry of the Lord Jesus.
He knew the giants of the faith: Peter, the apostles, and his cousin
from Cyprus, Barnabas (Col. 4:10).
He saw godly people praying and saw prayers answered. These were good examples for him to see
in his formative years.
Peter, in his first epistle, calls John Mark, my son (5:13). This could be an indication that Peter was the one who had the privilege of sharing the gospel with him and leading him to put his trust in the Lord Jesus Christ as his Savior. John Mark knew the traumatic events that took place in Jerusalem during Passover of AD 30, but he may not have understood the significance of the events. Perhaps he heard Peter preach to the Jewish people in Jerusalem from the Land of Israel as well as the Diaspora on the day of Pentecost, and he was one of the three thousand that trusted the Lord Jesus as Savior (Acts 2:14-41). In this sermon, Peter, using the Hebrew Scriptures, demonstrates that the death and resurrection of the Lord Jesus was the fulfillment of what the Hebrew prophets had predicted years before (I Pet. 1: 10-12). He concluded that the death of the Lord Jesus was important because He paid for all sins so that John Mark and all who believed on (put their trust in) the Lord Jesus could have the remission of those sins.
I said first missionary tour you probably are thinking of Paul and Barnabas'
first missionary tour. Actually,
John Mark had an earlier one.
Jerome, the 4th century AD Church Father, wrote an
interesting book called The Lives of Illustrious Men. In
this book, he gives a short biography of the Apostle Peter. He says: After having been bishop of the church at Antioch and having
preached to the Dispersion [the Jewish Diaspora] – the believers in
circumcision, in Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia and Bithynia – pushed
on to Rome in the second year of Claudius (1994: 3: 361). The second year of Emperor Claudius was
the year AD 42.
sends an epistle back to the churches which were established on this missionary
journey as a follow-up letter. The
letter was carried by the good services of his partner on that journey,
Silvanus (I Pet. 4:12). As
mentioned before, he sends John Mark's greeting along with the letter. The implication of this passage is that
John Mark was along on this missionary journey as Peter and Silvanus's disciple
and helper. This tour probably
lasted a year or two (AD 41-42).
John Mark would have been about 29 or 30 years old at this time. He continued with Peter in Rome for a
short period of time.
goes on to say: Mark the disciple and interpreter of Peter wrote a short
gospel at the request of the brethren in Rome embodying what he had heard Peter
tell (Lives of Illustrious Men 8; 1994: 3: 364).
makes a similar statement. Again,
quoting Papias, he writes, Mark became Peter's interpreter and wrote
accurately all that he remembered, not, indeed, in order, of the things said or
done by the Lord. For he had not
heard the Lord, nor had he followed Him, but later on, as I said, followed
Peter, who used to give teaching as necessity demanded but not making, as it
were, an arrangement of the Lord's oracles, so that Mark did nothing wrong in
thus writing down single points as he remembered them. For to one thing he gave attention, to
leave out nothing of what he had heard and to make no false statements in them
(Ecclesiastical History 3:39:15;
LCL 1: 297). John Mark, at about the
age of 30, wrote the first recorded life of the Lord Jesus as he heard from
Peter. I'm sure on their
missionary journey John Mark heard Peter recount the stories of Jesus over and
over again to different audiences.
By the end of the journey he knew them well, and the Holy Spirit
directed him as he penned the Gospel of Mark (II Tim. 3:16, 17; II Pet. 1:21).
The early believers that composed the church in Rome were of Jewish heritage as well as proselytes (Acts 2:10). Since Peter was an apostle to those of the circumcision (Gal. 2:7-9), John Mark's gospel would have a Jewish perspective and it presented the Lord Jesus as the Son of God (Mark 1:1).
city of Alexandria in Egypt had the largest Jewish population outside Eretz
Israel, the Land of Israel. Philo, a First Century AD Jewish philosopher,
living in the city, said that the Jewish population of Egypt was about one
million Jews and a large portion of them lived in Alexandria (Flaccus 43; 1993: 728).
The New Testament says nothing about John Mark's
ministry in Egypt. Yet we have
Jerome's account of what happened after John Mark wrote his gospel. Jerome states: 'So, taking the gospel
which he himself composed, he went to Egypt and first preaching Christ at
Alexandria he formed a church so admirable in doctrine and continence of living
that he constrained all followers of Christ to his example. Philo most learned of the Jews seeing
the first church at Alexandria still Jewish in a degree, wrote a book on their
manner of life as something creditable to his nation telling how, as Luke says,
the believers had all things in common at Jerusalem, so he recorded that he saw
was done at Alexandria, under the learned Mark (Lives of Illustrious Men 8; 1994: 3: 364).
this passage is not inspired by the Holy Spirit, it is very instructive. Notice two things about the church in
Alexandria. First, they were
'admirable in doctrine. John Mark
made the teaching of the great doctrines of the Word of God a priority in the
church in Alexandria. This was a
principle that he had learned while he was in fellowship in the Jerusalem
assembly. Acts 2:42 says, And
they continued steadfastly in the Apostles' doctrine and fellowship, in the
breaking of bread, and in prayers."
He also instructed the people in the Hebrew Bible as well as the epistle
I Peter and the Gospel of Mark. He
also taught them what he had learned from Peter and the other apostles in
Jerusalem. The second thing that
is mentioned about this church is that it had ̉continence of living," apparently
applying what they learned from the Scriptures to their own lives. Jerome goes on to records that the
believers had 'all things in common' (cf. Acts 2:44). John Mark had seen this modeled by the church in Jerusalem
and he was able to instill this in the church in Alexandria (Acts 2:44;
4:32). Perhaps one example he used
was his cousin Barnabas who sold all that he had and laid it at the feet of the
apostles (Acts 4:36, 37; see also Lives of Illustrious Men 11 [Philo]; 1994: 3: 365).
Mark instructed the assembly in Alexandria and instilled in then the pattern of
church polity and practice that he had seen modeled in the Jerusalem assembly.
final thing to notice about Jerome's description of John Mark is that he was a
'learned' man. He was a student of
the Word of God and devoured all that Peter and the other apostles taught from
the Word of God. John Mark's
initial ministry in Alexandria was from AD 42-44.
Mark apparently went up to Jerusalem for the Passover (recorded in Acts 12)
which coincided with the beginning of the famine in AD 44 that lasted until AD
48 (Shea 1992: 2: 772). More than
likely, John Mark brought with him grain and foodstuff from Egypt for the
believers in Jerusalem.
Interestingly, Egypt was the Breadbasket for Rome, noted for its grain
and other foodstuffs.
After Peter's miraculous escape from prison toward the end of the Feast of Unleavened Bread, Luke records that he went to another place (Acts 12:17). Unfortunately Luke does not tell us where he went. He could have gone to Antioch-on-the-Orontes, or even back to Rome, where Peter describes himself as a fellow elder [not the first pope] among the elders in the church in Rome (I Pet. 5:1).
and Saul went up to Jerusalem at the beginning of the famine in AD 44 and
brought relief from the Church in Antioch. When they finished delivering the money and goods, they
returned to Antioch and brought John Mark with them (Acts 12:25). John Mark ministered in Antioch for
three years (AD 44-47) in which time Barnabas and Paul had opportunities to
observe what his strengths and spiritual gifts were. As they observed him, it would appear that he had the serving
gift of helps (I Cor. 12:28; Rom. 12:7; cf. II Tim. 4:11; I Pet. 4:10). John Mark was always ministering to and
serving, other people and he did not care who got the credit for his labors. Other people were his priorities. He exercised his spiritual gift of
helps in order to build up the local assembly in Antioch.
William McRae, in his book The Dynamics of Spiritual Gifts, says that the person with the gift of helps has the unusual capacity to serve faithfully behind the scenes, in practical ways, to assist in the work of the Lord and encourage and strengthen others spiritually (1976: 47). He goes on to say, A person with this gift will loathe the limelight but be the backbone of an effective church (1976: 47). By exercising his spiritual gift, John Mark caught the eyes of Barnabas and Paul and this led him to a greater sphere of service.
Holy Spirit separated Barnabas and Saul to the work to which He had called
them. After fasting and praying,
the saints in Antioch laid hands on Barnabas, Paul and probably John Mark and
sent them on their way in the year AD 47.
Barnabas and Saul realized they would need help for
this endeavor. They had seen John
Mark engaged in the Lord's work and exercising his serving gift of helps in the
assembly in Antioch and thought he would be the ideal person to take
along. At the age of 35, John Mark
joined them on his second missionary journey.
Dr. Luke described John Mark as an assistant. (Acts
13:5). The Greek word is hupereten,
which is translated 'under rower. Paul would use this same word in I Cor.
4:1 when he writes: Let a man so consider us, as servants (hupereten) of Christ and stewards (oikonomous) of the mysteries of God." Some have speculated that Luke was a ships doctor which
would account for his uses of this and other nautical terms. The word picture is that of a large
vessel, called a trireme vessel that plied the Aegean Sea. This kind of ship had three decks of
oarsmen, or Under-rowers. These
were freedmen, not slaves, who had volunteered for this job. They were seated on the three decks
underneath the main deck and could not see where they were going or what was
going on around them. They were to
row by faith and not by sight (cf. II Cor. 5:7). In order to do this, they had to trust the captain on the top
deck to take them safely to their final destination. The captain had a drum at his side and the drummer would
beat out the strokes. Boom, then
they would take a stroke. Boom,
then they would take another stroke.
The only thing the under-rowers listened for was the beat of the captain's
drum and not that of any other ships around them. The word-picture is clear: John Mark was an under-rower,
listening to the drumbeat of Barnabas and Saul and doing what they requested.
first destination was the island of Cyprus and the harbor of Salamis that lies to
the south-west of Seleucia, the harbor for Antioch. The first place the Word of God was preached was in the
synagogues of Salamis (Acts 13:5).
went through the island to Paphos" (13:6), the capital of the island, visiting
the Jewish communities as well as relatives of Barnabas, and probably distant
relatives of John Mark, preaching the gospel to both Jewish people and Gentiles
on the island.
proconsul, Sergius Paulus, came to faith in the Lord Jesus (13:12) and most
likely sent the three missionaries to Perge in Pamphylia so they could take the
Via Sebaste to Pisidian Antioch, the home of some of the proconsul's
relatives. Sergius Paulus could
not leave his administrative position in Paphos in order to share the gospel
with his relatives; so he sent the three missionaries instead. At Perge, John, departing from them,
returned to Jerusalem (13:13).
Scholars have had a field day trying to figure out why John Mark departed and returned to Jerusalem. Some have suggested he did not like the change of leadership because Paul had taken charge instead of John Mark's cousin, Barnabas. So loyalty to his cousin was the issue. If one observes what happens after, Barnabas did not seem to have a problem with the change. Others have suggested that John Mark did not like the Gentile emphasis of the missionary journey. John Mark was a disciple of Peter, who was a missionary to the circumcision (Gal. 2:7-9). Others have suggested that John Mark returned to Jerusalem to take care of his mother (Cf. Matt. 10:37, 38; Luke 14:26). Perhaps Paul had the words of Jesus that John Mark had already penned in mind: Assuredly, I say to you, there is no one who has left house or brothers or sisters or father or mother or wife or children or lands, for My sake and the gospel's, who shall not receive a hundredfold now in this time – houses and brothers and sisters and mothers and children and lands, with persecutions – and in the age to come, eternal life. But many who are first will be last, and the last first (Mark 10:29-31). I think an underlying reason might be that John Mark had been there and done that." If we accept Jerome's implied statement that Peter visited Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia and Bithynia along with Silvanus / Silas between AD 41-42 and John Mark was with them, perhaps he had experienced (promised) persecution during the journey. This lack of courage to face more persecution led to unfaithfulness and John Mark's departure from the journey. Whatever the reason, Paul was very upset with John Mark's lack of faithfulness to the work of the Lord (Acts 15:37, 38). Paul would later write that faithfulness was mandatory for the Christian life in I Cor. 4:2. Moreover it is required (demanded) in stewards (oikonomois) that one be found faithful (cf. also Paul's example, I Tim. 1: 12).
and Barnabas spent at least two years in Galatia preaching the gospel and
planting churches (Acts 13:14-14:25).
Upon their return to Antioch-on-the-Orontes, they gave to the sending
church a report on how God had answered their prayers for Paul and Barnabas
(Acts 13:26-28). Paul also writes
an epistle back to the churches of Galatia (Gal. 1:2) because he was
flabbergasted that they had departed from the truth of the gospel so quickly (Gal.
1:6), because some were saying circumcision was essential for salvation. The same issue arose in the church at
Antioch and the leadership of the church sent Paul and Barnabas to Jerusalem in
order to consult with the apostles and elders on this matter (Acts
15:2-29). The Jerusalem council
declared that Gentiles did not have to be circumcised in order to be saved and
sent a letter back to Antioch with Paul and Barnabas stating this fact (Acts
Paul wanted to return to the churches in Cyprus and Galatia so he could follow-up on this divisive and heretical issue of circumcision for salvation. He suggested to Barnabas a second missionary journey. Barnabas thought it was a good idea and wanted to take John Mark with them.
text seems to imply that John Mark had left Jerusalem and was residing in
Antioch again. We are not told
when he returned to Antioch or what the circumstance was that brought him back
to the city.
There was a strong dispute between Paul and Barnabas over whether to take John Mark on this second missionary journey or not. In the end, they decided to go their separate ways and Barnabas and John Mark went to Cyprus, and Paul and Silas went to Galatia (Acts 15:36-41) in AD 49.
A budding young musician, with his violin case under
his arms, asked an elderly New Yorker how to get to Carnegie Hall. The gentleman looked at him and said,
'Son, it's very simple. Practice, practice, practice!"
Mark had at least one setback in his walk with the Lord. At one point in his life he had a
problem with faithfulness to the Lord's work. His mentor, Barnabas, always the encourager, worked with him
in this area of his life while they were in Cyprus. The Apostle James had written, But be doers of the Word, and
not hearers only (1:22). John
Mark took that to heart and practiced, practiced, practiced faithfulness.
is silent on the activities of John Mark for the next ten or eleven years. When Paul wrote his first epistle to
the Corinthians (AD 56), he mentioned Barnabas and seemed to indicate that he was
still alive and actively ministering the Word of God, but we are not told where
he was or what he was doing.
The Acts of Barnabas described Barnabas and John Mark's ministry throughout the island of Cyprus and also Barnabas' martyrdom and burial (Roberts and Donaldson 1994: 493-496). After, John Mark recounts the burial of Barnabas, the John Mark in the account returns to Alexandria in Egypt for a second time, along with several of the brethren from Cyprus in order to minister the Word of God in that city. Historically, this is plausible, but Scripture is silent; so it is uncertain.
next time we see John Mark in the Scriptures he is in Rome with the Apostle
Paul who was under house arrest and awaiting trial before Nero in the years AD
60-62. John Mark was approaching
the half-century mark for his age!
writing an epistle to the church at Colossae, sent greetings from several
brethren who are with him in Rome, including John Mark. He instructs the believers in Colossae
to welcome John Mark if he comes by the city during his travels (Col. 4:10). John Mark apparently was planning a
trip to Asia Minor, perhaps to help Timothy in the work in Ephesus, or continue
to Alexandria again. Along with
the letter to the church, Paul sends a personal letter to Philemon, the patron
and possibly an elder in the church at Colossae. At the close of the letter he send greetings from Epaphras,
(John) Mark, Aristarchus, Demas and Luke (Philemon 24). One gets the impression that John Mark
was known by the saints in Colossae and particularly Philemon. It is conjecture, but Peter, Silvanus
and John Mark, could have visited Colossae on their missionary journey some 20
years before when they went through Asia (I Pet. 1:1). This would account for John Mark's
greeting and their knowledge of him.
Unfortunately the Scriptures do not recount the reconciliation between Paul and John Mark. Did John Mark approach the Apostle Paul and ask for forgiveness and admit he was unfaithful to the Lord's work? We can only conjecture that Barnabas worked with John Mark on his faithfulness (I Cor. 4:2) while they were ministering in Cyprus, and somehow Paul got word that John Mark was again faithful to the Lord's work.
Paul was released from house arrest after appearing
before Nero and soon went on a fourth missionary journey. Early Church historians say he journeyed
to Spain. Scripture tells us that
he ministered on the island of Crete, and was in Macedonia and Asia Minor and
well as Corinth and Nicopolis. He
was re-arrested and landed in prison in Rome in AD 67. This time Nero was not as nice as the
first time they met at Paul's first defense (II Tim. 4:16).
Paul wrote to his son in the faith, Timothy, who was engaged in evangelistic work in Ephesus and tells him, 'Get [John] Mark and bring him with you, for he is useful to me for ministry (II Tim. 4:11). At age 55, John Mark is still playing second fiddle!!! The word ministry (diakonia) stresses not the office but the service rendered. Mark had demonstrated his power of organization and practical usefulness, so Paul felt that Mark was just the man he now needed in Rome (Hiebert 1992: 78). Plus, he was still exercising his spiritual serving gift of helps. John Mark was modeling Biblical greatness. The one who is the greatest is the one who is the servant (diakonos).
Death of John Mark
Jerome records that John Mark died in the 8th year of Nero's reign and was buried in Alexandria (Lives of Illustrious Men 8; 1994: 3: 364). The 8th year of Nero's reign was AD 62. This statement creates a seeming chronological problem. When Paul was released from house arrest, they would have gone their separate ways: Paul to Spain and Crete and John Mark to Asia Minor, possibly on his way to Alexandria, Egypt for a third time. John Mark would have died soon after their departure according to Jerome's account. I find it hard to believe that Paul was not informed of the death of his friend, even while in Spain, Crete, Macedonia or Asia Minor. After Paul was rearrested he called for John Mark to come to Rome with Timothy, thus indicating that he was very much alive in AD 67. More than likely, Jerome did not accurately record the date of John Mark's death.
can we learn from the life and ministry of John Mark? There are at least six lessons we can learn from this true
servant of the Servants of God.
playing second fiddle may not be all that bad. In light of the Judgment Seat of Christ, it really does not
make any difference who gets the credit for the work done in this life. You see, the Lord keeps the record
books! In that day, our individual
works are made manifest, even those things that somebody else got credit for
even though we did it, those things that you did and nobody even saw you do,
those things that were quietly done with no fanfare, they will be openly rewarded
by the Lord (I Cor. 3:11-15; II Cor 5:10; Rev. 22:12). What matters in this life is that the
Lord Jesus gets the credit because what we accomplished for Him was done by His
grace and through His strength (Ephesians 6:10). A principle that Jesus set forth in the Sermon on the Mount
applies in this situation. What is
done in secret will be rewarded openly (Matt. 6:1-8, 16-18). Sometimes it may be in this life, but
for sure it will be at the Judgment Seat of Christ.
Second, John Mark modeled a servant's heart. He always had people as his priority
and was serving them. This was a
lesson that he learned when he penned the words of Jesus in Mark 10:
42-45. You know that those who
are considered rulers over the Gentiles lord it over them, and there great ones
exercise authority over them. Yet
it shall not be so among you; but whoever desires to become great among you
shall be your servant (diakonos). And whoever of you desires to be first
shall be slave (doulos) of
all. For even the Son of Man did
not come to be served (diakovathanai), but to serve (diakonasai),
and to give His life a ransom for many."
When Paul was in prison for a second time, he called
for John Mark because of his reputation of service / ministry (diakonia). John
Mark was great in the eyes of God because of his servant's heart. Do we have a servant's heart, or are we
living for ourselves?
never underestimate what a young person can learn spiritually. Someone once said, Lessons are more
caught, than taught." John Mark
had godly influence as a young person and saw the Lord working in the early church. He saw God answer prayer and people
coming to faith in the Lord Jesus.
He had parents who set a godly example of service for the Lord Jesus
(Ephesians 6:4; Col. 3:21), examples and lessons that he would use later in his
ministry. Do young people, or
children for that matter, see their parents on their knees praying for family
and friends, the local assembly and a lost and dying world that needs to hear
the gospel? Do they see them
studying the Word of God and reading it in family gatherings? Do they see their parents involved in
the local assembly, setting an example for the young people to follow? Our young people are the next
generation to carry on the Lord's work.
What kind of example are we setting for them?
Fourth, Jerome points out that John Mark was
learned in the Scriptures. Are
you listening carefully to the preacher / Bible teacher and studying the Word
of God on your own?
Fifth, John Mark was exercising his spiritual serving
gift of ministry / helps and was using it to build up the Body of Christ, the
Church (I Cor. 14:12). Do you know
what your spiritual gift is and are you using it to build up the Body of Christ? The list of spiritual gifts can be
found in Romans 12, I Corinthians 14 and I Peter 4:10, 11.
none of us are immune to failure in the Christian life. It is important to note where John
Mark's lapse into unfaithfulness falls in the chronology of his life. He has already gone with Peter on a
missionary journey, written the gospel of Mark, planted a church in Alexandria,
and spent three years working with the Apostles Barnabas and Paul in the growing
church at Antioch. He had been
walking with the Lord for at least seventeen years and engaged in full time
work for at least seven years. At
the age of 35 he has a temporary lapse into unfaithfulness to the work of the
Lord. What does John Mark do? He could have bagged the Christian life
completely, but he does not. We
are not told the details, but we can assume that John Mark confessed his sin (I
John 1:9) of unfaithfulness to the Lord.
Most likely his cousin, Barnabas, worked with him in this area of his
life (Gal. 6:1). John Mark Practiced,
practiced, practiced, learned the lesson of faithfulness and went on for the
Lord. Do we get discouraged when
we fail and contemplate throwing in the towel and not make the effort to live
the Christian life? Or, like John
Mark, do we recognize our problem, confess it to the Lord, get help from a
mature Christian and go on for the Lord?
There is much to learn from this servant of the Servants of God who enjoyed playing second fiddle. He was good at this difficult, yet unglamorous task. Might we take these lessons to heart and apply them to our lives.
1980 Discovering Jerusalem. Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson.
1976 The Life and Times of Jesus the Messiah. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans. Fifth printing.
1980 Ecclesiastical History. Translated by K. Lake. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University. Loeb Classical Library.
Hiebert, D. Edmond
1992 In Paul's Shadows. Friends and Foes of the Great Apostle. Greenville, SC: Bob Jones University.
1994 Lives of Illustrious Men. Pp. 349-402 in Nicene and Post-Nicene Fathers. Vol. 3, 2nd series. Edited by P. Schaff and H. Wace. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson.
1876 The Dynamics of Spiritual Gifts. Grand Rapids: Zondervan.
1993 The Works of Philo. Translated by C. D. Yonge. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson.
Roberts, Alexander, and Donaldson, James, eds.
1994 The Acts of Barnabas. Pp. 355, 493-496 in Ante-Nicene Fathers. Vol. 8. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson. Reprint of 1886 edition.
1992 Famine. Pp. 769-773 in Anchor Bible Dictionary. Vol. 2. Edited by D. N. Freedman. New York: Doubleday.
1989 The High Priest's Servant's Ear: Mark 14:47. Revue Biblique 96/1: 71-80.
 Phone conversation on May 30, 2006. My thanks and appreciation to Mr. Elmore for taking the time to explain the second fiddle to me, the conversation was both interesting and very informative.
 This book has more an air of truth about it than any of the others. There is not much extravagance in the details, and the geography is correct, showing that the writer knew Cyprus well. It seems to have been written at all events before 478, in which year the body of Barnabas is said to have been found in Cyprus (Roberts and Donaldson 1994: 3: 355). There are, however, some internal problems with John Mark's being the author of the Acts of Barnabas. First, in the Acts of Barnabas, John Mark claims to have been a servant of Cyrillas the high priest of Jupiter. The Book of Acts suggests he was of Jewish heritage and not involved in pagan worship. Second, in the Acts of Barnabas, John Mark is baptized by Paul, Barnabas and Silas in Iconium. More than likely John Mark was baptized in Jerusalem by Peter who led him to the Lord. There are other inconsistencies with the account in the Scriptures; so the Acts of Barnabas should be used with caution.
 Papias, the pupil of John, bishop of Hierapolis in Asia (Jerome, Lives of Illustrious Men 18; Schaff and Wace 1994: 3: 367).
 Jerome confirms that John Mark, the writer of the gospel that bears his name, is the same John Mark that Peter is referring to in this passage (Lives of Illustrious Men 8; 1994: 3: 364).
 John Mark is considered the patron saint of the Coptic Church in Egypt.
 I believe that the epistle of James was written by James the son of Zebedee soon after AD 30 as a follow-up letter to those from the Diaspora (James 1:1) who came to faith in the Lord Jesus on the Day of Pentecost (Acts 2:41).
by Ray Stedman:
Many scholars think that the Gospel of Mark is the very earliest New Testament Scripture we have. It was probably written sometime in the sixties of the first century, which would make it very early, going back to the beginnings of the Christian story. Scholars differ, however, as to whether Matthew or Mark wrote first, because it is hard to tell who borrowed from whom -- Matthew from Mark, or Mark from Matthew. Certainly we know that Luke borrowed from both Matthew and Mark. It is true that Mark's gospel is reproduced entirely in Matthew and Luke, except for a few verses. So somebody had to borrow from somebody else -- had to have someone else's account before him -- as he wrote.
We do know that this gospel was written by a young man named John Mark, who appears several times in our Scriptures. His mother was named Mary, and was a rather wealthy woman who had a big house in Jerusalem. In the twelfth chapter of Acts we are told that the early disciples held a large church prayer meeting in her house for Peter when he was put in prison. We know that young John Mark was taken by Paul and Barnabas on their first missionary journey, traveling with them to the island of Cyprus. But, for some reason -- we are never told quite why -- Mark refused to go with them when they went on into the mainland of what today is Turkey. Instead he went back home to his mother's house. Paul was upset about that, and evidently felt that Mark was a quitter. When it came time for them to go out again, although Barnabas wanted to bring Mark, Paul would not let him come. So they separated. Barnabas took Mark with him to Cyprus and Paul and Silas went back to the areas where they had gone before. Then Mark drops out of sight for a time.
The next we hear of him, he is an associate of the Apostle Peter, who speaks very affectionately of this young man -- calls him "Mark, my son" in his first letter (1 Peter 5:13). Early church tradition tells us that Mark became the companion of Peter. Eusebius, a church father writing in the third century, says that the early Christians were so entranced with all the things Peter told them that they asked Mark to write them down. Perhaps that is how we got The Gospel According to Mark, for it reflects much of Peter's memories and experiences with Jesus.
This much about the origin of the Gospel of Mark can be verified from Scripture. But there is another aspect of it which perhaps I ought to call "Stedman's speculation", because it is not inspired, but is something which long has intrigued me: I pass it along for you to make of it what you will. In Chapter 14, Verse 51, reference is made to an incident which only Mark records. In his account of Jesus' betrayal and arrest. Mark tells us that as he was being led away by the soldiers, a young man followed him, wearing nothing but a linen cloth about his body. Apparently thinking he was a disciple of Jesus who had been foolish enough to remain behind while all the others had run for their lives, the soldiers attempted to seize him. But all they got was the cloth as he ran naked into the night. Many scholars have suggested that this was Mark, for he would have been a "young man" at that time. Perhaps, because of his fascination with Jesus, he had been hanging around, hoping to learn more, had gotten into this trap unknowingly, and had to flee for his life, leaving his garment behind. The fact that Mark is the only one who mentions this incident is highly suggestive that this indeed was Mark himself.
But there is another story, in Mark 10, found in Matthew and Luke as well, which has fascinated me -- the story of the rich young ruler. Here we have a young man who, toward the end of Jesus' ministry, came to him with a question. He was a wealthy young man of the ruling class, evidently a handsome, very warm person. He ran up and knelt at Jesus' feet, and said, "Good Teacher, what must I do to inherit eternal life?" (Mark 10:17b RSV). Jesus Said, "Have you kept the commandments?" The young man said he had kept them from his youth. Then Mark records something that neither of the other accounts tell us. He says, "And Jesus looking upon him loved him," (Mark 10:21a RSV). That little personal note suggests to me that Mark was that rich young ruler.
So perhaps that little story of the young man who ran away without his robe is Mark's way of telling us that the rich young ruler who went from Jesus so sorrowfully -- as the account tells us, because he had great possessions -- did not remain sad, that later on, having thought things over, he made the commitment Jesus required of him: he gave away all that he had. He gave up his inheritance, and all he had left was a robe -- and he lost even that, finally, and he came and followed Jesus. I do not say that the Scriptures tell us explicitly this is what happened -- but I think it is! So, if you do not mind the "Stedmaniac" version, this gives us a little added insight into The Gospel According to Mark.
At any rate, if something like that happened, it would account for Mark's seeming fascination with two qualities of Jesus which he gives to us in the very first words of this gospel: "The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God," (Mark 1:1). Jesus of Nazareth, a carpenter, the human Jesus -- but also the Son of God -- the Divine One. Mark seems to be very fascinated by that combination: the Ruler who manifests his ability to serve, and the Servant who knows how to rule.
That, by the way, is how the book is organized. Mark is very easy to outline, because the author gives us certain natural divisions, as we will see as we go along. It falls readily into two halves. The first, Chapter 1 through Chapter 8, Verse 26, is The Servant Who Rules -- the authority of the servant. The second, from Chapter 8, Verse 27 through to the end, is The Ruler Who Serves. Let's read the opening verses:
The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God. As it is written in Isaiah the prophet,
"Behold, I send my messenger before thy face,
who shall prepare thy way;
the voice of one crying in the wilderness:
Prepare the way of the Lord,
make his paths straight -- "
John the baptizer appeared in the wilderness, preaching a baptism of repentance for the forgiveness of sins. And there went out to him all the country of Judea, and all the people of Jerusalem; and they were baptized by him in the river Jordan, confessing their sins. (Mark 1:1-5 RSV)
That is an amazing statement Mark makes. His emphasis right from the outset in this gospel -- which he calls "the beginning of the gospel," the place to begin -- is the ministry of John the Baptist. And the highlight of that ministry was the fantastic success John enjoyed way out in the wilderness. About this time last year I was in that wilderness. We drove from the city of Jerusalem down to Jericho, then up the valley of the Jordan River. I noted that this is indeed a wilderness. It is a dreary, desolate, forsaken, lonely spot -- even today. The Jordan flows through here, but it is the only water for miles around. It is a parched and dreary place, rimmed by desert mountains, barren and sere and dry.
Yet the people of Jerusalem and Judea left their cities, left their recreations and pleasures, and trekked through this howling wilderness to listen to a man preach. They probably had to walk twenty or thirty miles to hear John, but did so willingly and in such increasing degree that Mark here records, in only slight exaggeration, that "all the country of Judea, and all the people of Jerusalem" came out to hear him.
Most of us conceive of John as a rugged, fearless individual who preached thundering judgment and torment and condemnation to everybody. But if that were the kind of message John preached, nobody would have left Jerusalem to hear it. Nobody is interested in going to hear somebody excoriate them, strip and lash and flay them. Anybody who preaches like that does not have much of a following for long. And John did not preach like that, either. Mark tells us that his message was the beginning of the good news of Jesus Christ. Something drew these people out of all these cities and brought them down into this desert area. It was to listen to this strange and rugged young preacher proclaim good news to them.
It is evident that John spoke to a universal need in their lives. We do not have to guess what it was, because it is still around. It is exactly the same need that grips people's hearts today. They were victims of a syndrome that every human being suffers from today -- just as they did then. The syndrome consists of three elements: sin, guilt, and fear. Those always go together.
What is sin? Well, basically and fundamentally, sin is self-centeredness, that's all. We commit sins because we are thinking of ourselves, loving ourselves, indulging ourselves, looking out for ourselves, taking care that no one get ahead of us. That is the essence of sin -- self-centeredness. We are all victims of it. There is not one of us who does not struggle in this area. We find ourselves trapped in it constantly. That is the curse which hangs over our whole human race. We were made by God to be vessels to convey his outgoing love, to reach out with it to everyone around us. Somehow that has become twisted, so that now -- instead of reaching out -- we reach in, and we love ourselves first.
And sin always produces guilt. Guilt is dislike of ourselves. We do not like the fact that we hurt others -- and we know we do. We feel responsible because we see the damage we do in other people's lives by our self-centeredness, and we feel guilty about it. We learn to hate ourselves to a considerable degree. That is why psychologists say that the great problem humanity wrestles with is self-hatred. Carl Menninger wrote a book, Man Against Himself, in which he documents that this is what we do. We hate ourselves. We do not like ourselves. We lose our self-respect. That is guilt.
Guilt is always accompanied by fear, because fear is self-distrust. Fear is feeling unable to handle life anymore, being aware that there are forces and powers we are unable to control, and which eventually are going to confront us. We are not able to handle them, and so we run from them. Even in the Garden of Eden, as soon as Adam and Eve sinned they felt guilty, and they hid in fear. It has been the history of the race ever since. Fear looms up, that uncertainty about the future, and we become fearful, timid people, afraid of what will happen next. We are walking on eggs all the time, afraid of being accepted or rejected, afraid of what people will do to us -- and especially, finally, afraid of what God is going to do to us. That is an inner torment the like of which there is no equal.
One of the places I saw in Mexico City was the Shrine of Guadeloupe. According to legend, the Virgin Mary appeared to an Indian back in the sixteenth century and healed him. Subsequently the site has become a healing shrine to which people come from all of Mexico. There are rooms stacked with crutches, left behind by people who have thrown them away, feeling they had been healed at the shrine. Some of them may have been. But any day you go there you can see people walking on their knees, crawling for blocks over dirty, rough pavement to get to that shrine. It is painful. They leave bloodstains on the pavement as they crawl along. Why would they do such a thing? Because the outward torture of bloody, lacerated knees is not half so hard to bear as their inner torment of guilt and fear. Someone has told them this will relieve that inner torment, and this is why they do it.
If we think that is superstitious nonsense, we need to look at some of the means we employ to free ourselves of guilt and fear. There is philanthropy, for instance. Some people try to give their money away. I know many people who have benefited from guilty consciences, as wealthy individuals have tried to satisfy that inner sense of guilt and fear by giving money to some cause or other. Then there are those who turn into rigid moralists, who think of themselves as practically perfect, while looking down on those (everybody else) who do not measure up to the standard they have set for themselves -- which they do not measure up to either. But that is a way of paying for the guilt inside -- a way widely evident in evangelical circles, incidentally. This is what drove all these people out of Jerusalem.
Here, suddenly, appeared a strange man who announced something. That is all he did. He never told how it worked, or why; he just announced it. But somehow the word got back to Jerusalem that it was working, that people were finding relief. The city began to stir, as word spread around from mouth to mouth, until finally the people began to stream out into this desert place and find John the Baptist, listen to what he had to say, and be baptized by him. An amazing phenomenon, is it not?
Now, what was it that he announced, which drew people like that? This is what Mark settles on next. He says there are four things which are part of the ministry of John: One, it was anticipated in the Old Testament. The prophets spoke of it. Two, John appeared in a wilderness, according to that promise. Three, he announced the way to God. And, four, he assured people that it was true by the symbol of baptism. We will look at those individually.
First, this anticipation in the Old Testament: Mark quotes the prophets -- two of them, though he names only one. "Behold, I send my messenger before thy face, who shall prepare thy way," is from Malachi Malachi 3:1a), the last book of the Old Testament. Mark does not mention him, and some scholars have gotten all upset about this, for they think that Mark was mistaken, and ascribed to Isaiah something written by Malachi. You can read hundreds of pages of argument on this. But Mark was not mistaken, or ignorant, or anything else; he simply wanted to stress what Isaiah said, because what Malachi said agrees with it. So he simply combines the two and begins with a word from Malachi, "Behold, I, (God), send my messenger before thy (Messiah's) face, who shall prepare thy way..." Then Isaiah comes in, "...the voice of one crying in the wilderness: Prepare the way of the Lord, make his paths straight -- " And, in accordance with that, Mark says, "John the baptizer appeared in the wilderness, preaching a baptism of repentance for the forgiveness of sins."
Why would God have anticipated this truth so strongly? It is clear that God knew that a step of preparation had to be made in the hearts of men before God and man could come together. God does not just suddenly appear before men and expect man to receive him. He would only frighten him to death. Some preparation had to be made. So John was sent as that preparer, to go before the Lord and prepare the way for him-- by means of repentance, which we will examine in a moment.
Why was it predetermined that John was to begin his ministry in the wilderness? If he had been listening to the public relations men of that day, he would never have begun in the wilderness, of all places. That is certainly no place to start a ministry with which you expect to reach the whole populace. But God seldom listens to PR men -- or they to him -- and so John began his ministry in the wilderness, the worst possible place. But it worked!
God chose the wilderness because it is a symbol, a very apt symbol. It is symbolic of where John's message was to fall upon the wilderness of mankind. The desert is a picture of us, of our dry, empty, barren, weary, bored, and distraught lives.
The other day I was reading an article on the breakup of the marriage of Richard Burton and Elizabeth Taylor, who had been heralded for so long as the ideal couple. But then we got the inside story of what was going on. Do you know what broke up their marriage? Sheer, utter boredom. They were just bored -- bored with each other, bored with their lives -- having everything they ever wanted, but not wanting what they had.
A Christian friend told me about a neighbor he had known for a long time, a very intelligent man who made a lot of money and had everything he wanted. But he came over one day, sat down at my friend's kitchen table, buried his face in his hands, and said, "God! but I'm bored!" Two weeks later he took his own life. That is the desert, that is where people live. And that is why John appeared there. It is God's symbol to us of the hope that will spring up, even in the midst of the desert of our experience.
Then John announced this great word: that repentance is the way man comes to God, and that the result is the forgiveness of sins. The greatest blessing a person can experience is to have his sins forgiven. This is what these people were looking for, and this is what they found as they streamed out of Jerusalem to listen to John. They found forgiveness of sins, and it came by way of repentance.
Forgiveness needs to be understood. It is always in two movements. Somehow we have grown up with the idea that you forgive people only when they come and apologize to you. If you can get the person who has done something wrong to admit it and apologize to you, then you forgive him. That is absolutely wrong! Very few acts of reconciliation would ever take place on that basis. No, forgiveness has to start before the offender comes to you.
That is the glory of the story of the prodigal son, is it not? He came back from the far country, having wasted his father's goods and his own life, broken and humbled and ready to make himself his father's servant. But the moment his father spied him, his arms were open. And before that boy could say a word he was in his father's arms, being kissed and hugged while the fatted calf was prepared. Forgiveness starts in the heart of the one offended. He finds a basis on which, for some reason valid to him, he is ready to forget the hurt, to absorb it all himself and forget it. Because that is what forgiveness means -- forgetting it, not holding it over the person's head and bringing it up every now and then, but forgetting it, treating the person as if it had never happened.
The basis on which God does that is the cross of Jesus Christ. It renders him free to do so because it protects and maintains his justice. But the basis upon which we are exhorted to forgive is that we ourselves have already been forgiven. That is why Jesus told the story of the man who had been forgiven a tremendous debt, but who then grabbed by the throat a man who owed him ten dollars, and said, "Pay me what you owe me!" (Matthew 18:28b). Jesus says that is what we are like when we do not forgive those who offend us. We have been forgiven a tremendous debt, and on that basis we are to forgive others. So that is where it starts -- in a change of attitude in the heart of the one who has been offended.
But it can never be successful or complete until there has been a change of attitude in the heart of the offender. That is, it must be accepted by the one who has given the offense. He has to acknowledge that it was an offense, has to acknowledge the guilt. That is what is called "repentance." You must change your mind, stop justifying it, admit that it was hurtful, and then the pardon can be received, forgiveness can be applied.
I do not know any clearer illustration of that principle than the brooding, tragic, tortured man who sits today in San Clemente, unable to enjoy the pardon he has been given because he is not willing to admit that he did anything wrong. That is why John preached repentance -- because it is the place where God meets man.
That is why the prophet Isaiah said John's message would be like a great bulldozer, building a highway in the desert for God to come to the isolated stranger in the midst of the wilderness. Without a road you cannot drive out into the desert in order to help somebody. You must have a road, a highway in the desert. John was God's bulldozer to build that highway. You know how roads are built -- exactly as Isaiah describes in Chapter 40. "Every mountain shall be brought low, and every valley shall be lifted up; the crooked places shall be made straight, and the rough places plain," (Isaiah 40:4a). That is what repentance does. It brings down all the high peaks of pride that we stand on and refuse to admit are wrong. It takes the depressed areas of our life, where we beat and torture and punish ourselves, and lifts them up. It takes the crooked places, where we have lied and deceived, and straightens them out. And it makes the rough places plain. Then God is there, at that instant of repentance. Beautiful imagery, is it not? With this Mark links the character of John:
Now John was clothed with camel's hair, and had a leather girdle around his waist, and ate locusts and wild honey. (Mark 1:6 RSV)
Why would Mark put all that in? Here is this rugged prophet John. He is no fashion plate, with his camel's hair clothes, leather sandals, and leather girdle around his waist -- very much like Elijah. And his diet was very simple: locusts (grasshoppers) and wild honey. This is important, or it would not be here. Again, it is symbolic. But what does it symbolize? Well, you cannot wear anything more fundamental in the way of clothing, or eat a more basic diet, than John did. In other words it is representative of his ministry -- one of simple beginnings. It is not the end; it is the beginning. The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God is repentance on man's part. That is the place to begin. Even John's clothing and his diet said that.
His diet, by the way, was balanced. You food faddists will recognize immediately that grasshoppers are protein, and honey is carbohydrate. John's diet was in beautiful balance, so that he was a healthy man. But it was a most elementary, rudimentary sort of diet, just as his ministry was elementary, rudimentary, beginning right at the beginning -- nothing elaborate, just simple meat and potatoes. Furthermore, John himself said it was incomplete:
And he preached, saying, "After me comes he who is mightier than I, the thongs of whose sandals I am not worthy to stoop down and untie. I have baptised you with water; but he will baptize you with the Holy Spirit." (Mark 1:7-8 RSV)
John is very honest here. He says, "Don't look to me for answers beyond what I have already told you about repentance. Anything beyond that must come from Another, who is coming right after me. He is so much greater than I that I am not even worthy to untie his shoes. [This was his cousin he was referring to!] The sign of his greatness is that though I can take you to the place of outward cleansing only, he can do much more," (Matthew 3:11, John 1:15). In other words, John could bring people to God, but he could not take them beyond that, on with God. That required the life of the Holy Spirit. When Jesus came, he would baptize them with the Holy Spirit so that they could live on the basis they had begun on.
So much of Christian preaching today is on the same order as John's ministry -- designed only to bring people to God, and nothing more. It does not teach them how to live beyond that, and so people cannot go on. They know nothing of the power of the life of Jesus available through the Holy Spirit -- for all that was to come after John.
John brought people to Christ by the only way man can come -- through acknowledgment of guilt. When people come this way, God meets them, cleanses them, and forgives them. John demonstrated that by the baptism he performed. But there is a greater baptism -- that of the Holy Spirit. And on the day of Pentecost, when the Spirit of God came, you find Peter standing up and offering people two things: forgiveness of sins, and the promise of the Spirit. From that time on, this is what God has made available to any man or woman who will begin at the beginning -- the place of repentance.
Have you ever repented? Have you ever changed your mind stopped defending yourself and trying to blame everything on others, and said, "No, Lord, it's not they, it is just me. This is the way I am -- and I need help."? That is the place God will meet you. He always meets man at that point, washes away guilt, cleanses, forgives. That is where you will find forgiveness of sins. If you have never repented before, I urge you to do so now. God will meet you right there. In the quiet of your own heart, where God alone hears, you can say to him, "Lord, I repent. Lord, send me the Holy Spirit through Jesus Lord." And he will. If you are a Christian with a desert area in your life, and you do not know how to handle it, this is the place to begin. Repent, acknowledge it, and God will meet you there, and wash it all away. He does not have a word of condemnation for you, just a word of cleansing -- if you meet him at that place of repentance. (The Place to Begin by Ray Stedman)
John Mark (Wikipedia)
The Gospel of Mark (Wikipedia)
October 17, 2020